Motodude310
Go Kart Champion
That is completely coincidental.
Something I want to mention here - power is correlated with flow rate, not boost levels. Boost is just a measure of how much shit is in the way. For instance the S3 would read higher boost per HP than the APR because it doesn't flow as well as the Apr.Looks no one talk about the pressure drop
And ic size compare to power.
600hp core using it in a k04 level mod, definitely.not a good choice.
Yeah I agree that's pretty coincidental. You could feasibly have misfires sue to air that is way too cold to spark, but you'd be way beyond the difference that you would get between two IC's even at high rpm and full throttle.Timming the same. Fuel trim the same.but after change big ic i have high rpm misfire, solving by New coil pack and plug.
This issues make me think, more pressure to coil and plugs,,come from more high end power
Let's say
1.5 bar at big IC,.1.7bar at s3, intntake air temp is about the same
So which will have more power?
Correcti don't see how this correleates to pressure drop. are you saying both run the same inlet pressure but a bigger ic drops that much boost at the outlet?
I cant see, can only see intake pressure,by gauge or vagcom,how can see ithow much pressure at the turbo?
The Big IC,the more restrictionsPressure and temperature are directly proportional, cool the intake charge and pressure will be reduced. However this is not referred to as "intercooler pressure drop". Intercooler pressure drop is the measure of intercooler restriction, internal friction which equates to poor flow. Intercooler pressure drop is measured without taking into effect the intercoolers cooling characteristics. Put x pressure in and measure x pressure out at the same temp, the drop is the measure of its restriction.
There is no engineering justification from a performance stand point for sandwiching the intercooler. Rule #1 for a good intercooler is its ducting, the ability for it to accept air and discharge air. By having other "radiators" on the front side and back side impedes this greatly. Next the size of the intercooler is of outmost importance. An intercooler with more mass is better then one with less(everything else =), as it has more heat sinking ability. To big and yes you will suffer increased lag/throttle response, but there is a sweet spot for each application.
A true FMIC is going to be superior, air is cleanly directed in and out. VW did not design our setup with upmost performance in mind. They designed a system to work with a turbo working in its efficiency range to produce 200hp and at the lowest cost possible. Works just fine on a stock car and that was their intention. To say they had tuned cars in mind with this design is completely false. Truth is they were more concerned with the efficiency of the AC condenser then they were the intercooler, as is 98% of the public that bought these cars.
The Big IC,the more restrictions
But lower temperature,
it's hard to choose
I agree with this^ however, in the same sense, the difference you get from fmic vice middlemount at only 100 hp +- 50 over the stock 200 hp, isn't that probably negligible? Feel free to comment backPressure and temperature are directly proportional, cool the intake charge and pressure will be reduced. However this is not referred to as "intercooler pressure drop". Intercooler pressure drop is the measure of intercooler restriction, internal friction which equates to poor flow. Intercooler pressure drop is measured without taking into effect the intercoolers cooling characteristics. Put x pressure in and measure x pressure out at the same temp, the drop is the measure of its restriction.
There is no engineering justification from a performance stand point for sandwiching the intercooler. Rule #1 for a good intercooler is its ducting, the ability for it to accept air and discharge air. By having other "radiators" on the front side and back side impedes this greatly. Next the size of the intercooler is of outmost importance. An intercooler with more mass is better then one with less(everything else =), as it has more heat sinking ability. To big and yes you will suffer increased lag/throttle response, but there is a sweet spot for each application.
A true FMIC is going to be superior, air is cleanly directed in and out. VW did not design our setup with upmost performance in mind. They designed a system to work with a turbo working in its efficiency range to produce 200hp and at the lowest cost possible. Works just fine on a stock car and that was their intention. To say they had tuned cars in mind with this design is completely false. Truth is they were more concerned with the efficiency of the AC condenser then they were the intercooler, as is 98% of the public that bought these cars.
The problem is that there's no space to for the necessary core in the front-mount configuration. It's got to be too deep to be as efficient as the SMIC and though it gets substantially worse with higher power rating cores, you're still running a sub-optimal core at lower power levels.I agree with this^ however, in the same sense, the difference you get from fmic vice middlemount at only 100 hp +- 50 over the stock 200 hp, isn't that probably negligible? Feel free to comment back
Ok, but with that argument, what are some examples of tuner cars where this WOULDN'T be the case? I'm just curious as to why there is such an argument for which type is better, if the performance diff isn't even 1. Relevant and 2. an actual comparison of something that can be gained on the mk6. The way I see it, each type gives you a diff set of pros and cons. So... what? Lol its just a popularity contest??The problem is that there's no space to for the necessary core in the front-mount configuration. It's got to be too deep to be as efficient as the SMIC and though it gets substantially worse with higher power rating cores, you're still running a sub-optimal core at lower power levels.
I think the guy you quoted was being misleading by not mentioning the space constraints. He says that sandwiching is not best for efficiency of the core, which is correct in isolation. But you can't maintain the dimensions of the stock core in front of the radiator, which is important at any power level considering the trade off is throttle response.
Pressure and temperature are directly proportional, cool the intake charge and pressure will be reduced. However this is not referred to as "intercooler pressure drop". Intercooler pressure drop is the measure of intercooler restriction, internal friction which equates to poor flow. Intercooler pressure drop is measured without taking into effect the intercoolers cooling characteristics. Put x pressure in and measure x pressure out at the same temp, the drop is the measure of its restriction.
There is no engineering justification from a performance stand point for sandwiching the intercooler. Rule #1 for a good intercooler is its ducting, the ability for it to accept air and discharge air. By having other "radiators" on the front side and back side impedes this greatly. Next the size of the intercooler is of outmost importance. An intercooler with more mass is better then one with less(everything else =), as it has more heat sinking ability. To big and yes you will suffer increased lag/throttle response, but there is a sweet spot for each application.
A true FMIC is going to be superior, air is cleanly directed in and out. VW did not design our setup with upmost performance in mind. They designed a system to work with a turbo working in its efficiency range to produce 200hp and at the lowest cost possible. Works just fine on a stock car and that was their intention. To say they had tuned cars in mind with this design is completely false. Truth is they were more concerned with the efficiency of the AC condenser then they were the intercooler, as is 98% of the public that bought these cars.
Ok, but with that argument, what are some examples of tuner cars where this WOULDN'T be the case? I'm just curious as to why there is such an argument for which type is better, if the performance diff isn't even 1. Relevant and 2. an actual comparison of something that can be gained on the mk6. The way I see it, each type gives you a diff set of pros and cons. So... what? Lol its just a popularity contest??
Ok, but with that argument, what are some examples of tuner cars where this WOULDN'T be the case? I'm just curious as to why there is such an argument for which type is better, if the performance diff isn't even 1. Relevant and 2. an actual comparison of something that can be gained on the mk6. The way I see it, each type gives you a diff set of pros and cons. So... what? Lol its just a popularity contest??