GOLFMK8
GOLFMK7
GOLFMK6
GOLFMKV

I Keep getting tempted....

grambles423

Automotive Engineer
I keep things as objective as possible. WITH equal weight too...

I haven't lost at all. That mere statement means YOU LOST because it isn't a competition or somethign that can be won or lost...

You were wrong (not lost) and then had to qualify each of your statements (you might call it twist FOR YOU) to make yourself look better.

I assigned points from the onset saying you were right on 1 account and wrong on 6 accounts. After you had qualified (explained what you meant) you helped your case a tad.

EDIT: Let me rephrase that.....no wonder everyone has such a problem with you.
 
Last edited:

C4L

Banned
This month alone you have argued with the following well respected and contributing members:
DanielJ,
Grambles,
Gunkata,

Being wrong every time and simply wearing us all down with your page long posts about nothing but your opinions. Once we don't respond because you are so stubborn and nearsighted that you won't accept anyone else's facts/opinions besides your own, you chalk it up as a win.

You constantly twist data to back up your own points when you are clearly wrong. And you go as far as making up your own point system to try and prove others wrong with math you simply made up for that very post/thread.

You have never admitted to making a mistake and frankly you're the biggest troll on this forum.

That is all, I am sure everyone one else will agree.

WHO BROUGHT UP THE CAMRY IN RESPONSE TO MY GTI/MUSTANG COMPARISON???

What part of THIS argument was I wrong about?

The GTI performs better than the Camry - FACT (proven with actual figures)
The Camry is QUICKER in the 1/4 mile - FACT (proven with actual figures)

The GTI has more cargo room than the Camry - FACT (proven with actual figures)

The Camry has more passenger room than the GTI - FACT (proven with actual figures)

The GTI is less expensive than the Camry - FACT (proven with actual figures)

The GTI costs less annually in fuel - FACT (proven with actual/consistent figures and not national averages)

The GTI costs less to maintain - FACT (proven with actual figures and not averages)

The GTI costs less to insure - FACT (proven with concrete figures and not national averages)

What AREN'T you seeing here? Help me help you?:)
 

maxtdi

Go Kart Champion
^^^^^^^^WOW
 

C4L

Banned
.....and you wonder why I have such a problem with you............Get the hell out of here with your nonsense.

EDIT: Let me rephrase that.....no wonder everyone has such a problem with you.

You really don't understand??

There is NO winner or loser in an argument of conflicting ideas. Him THINKING there is a winner/loser means that arguments are futile.

Right and Wrong do NOT correlate with Winning and Losing...

He is WRONG on 6 accounts.
He is RIGHT on 1 account.

That has NOTHING to do with winning or losing...:confused:
 

grambles423

Automotive Engineer
How am I not?

If you can't prove it, it isn't true.

CONVERSELY

If you CAN prove it, it is true.

I just proved it for the 4th time now. On 6 of the 7 accounts at least.

REGARDING A CAR I DIDN'T EVEN MENTION...;)

Why were you so obsessed about proving him wrong? And....keeping score about it? That's just low........
 

C4L

Banned
Why were you so obsessed about proving him wrong? And....keeping score about it? That's just low........

Why is he so obsessed with proving me wrong??

I didn't even start the discussion. I never even mentioned the Camry but when HE did, I corrected his misstatements. DONE. Or should have been...

I am keeping proverbial score to help him see the error of his ways.
 

xytbyk

Go Kart Champion
I can't believe how negative this board gets sometimes, and this seems like a really low point.

It's important that people disagree. It's also great that you've both tried to qualify your arguments with data. That said, you guys have both put really dug deep in an absurd argument, and it is shitty to make personal attacks because you don't like the way people choose to present their case.

The criteria you're both debating aren't terribly useful if they don't describe the choices people are making. Does anyone know anybody who was *really* choosing between a GTI and a V6 Camry? No, right? You're arguing just to argue. Who gives a shit if you're being objective if the argument is meaningless?

Replace the GTI with a Passat V6 (0-60 in 6.1; 14.6 in the 1/4), and there is a useful discussion--just maybe not on a Mustang thread on a Mk6 board.

This isn't pleasant to read and it is too common.

Please, for the sake of us low-rung forum readers, please get back to debating the Mustang GT vs. our baby-peen turbo'ed cars.
 

danielj1

Go Kart Champion
Let's all take a break and step away from our computers for a bit.

Thanks
 

grambles423

Automotive Engineer
You really don't understand??

There is NO winner or loser in an argument of conflicting ideas. Him THINKING there is a winner/loser means that arguments are futile.

Right and Wrong do NOT correlate with Winning and Losing...

He is WRONG on 6 accounts.
He is RIGHT on 1 account.

That has NOTHING to do with winning or losing...:confused:

Oh...I 100% understand. I'm not retarded, but I just dont think our main goal on this forum is to be 100% right or 100% wrong all the time and then keep count of how many times a user was right or wrong. That's not how we roll here.
 

C4L

Banned
I can't believe how negative this board gets sometimes, and this seems like a really low point.

It's important that people disagree. It's also great that you've both tried to qualify your arguments with data. That said, you guys have both put really dug deep in an absurd argument, and it is shitty to make personal attacks because you don't like the way people choose to present their case.

The criteria you're both debating aren't terribly useful if they don't describe the choices people are making. Does anyone know anybody who was *really* choosing between a GTI and a V6 Camry? No, right? You're arguing just to argue. Who gives a shit if you're being objective if the argument is meaningless?

Replace the GTI with a Passat V6 (0-60 in 6.1; 14.6 in the 1/4), and there is a useful discussion--just maybe not on a Mustang thread on a Mk6 board.

This isn't pleasant to read and it is too common.

Please, for the sake of us low-rung forum readers, please get back to debating the Mustang GT vs. our baby-peen turbo'ed cars.

2 things;

1 - I didn't bring up the Camry so the 'troll' did JUST to start an argument. Then cried foul when he got one and was wrong.

2 - From Motor Trend;
Passat 3.6 - 5.7 to 60 and 14.2 in the 1/4 mile...
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests...swagen_passat_vr6_sel_comparison/viewall.html

I was specifically comparing the GTI and Mustang. The actual topic at hand. Then 'HE' brought in the Camry for NO REASON but to start shit...
 

shahabdin

Ready to race!
Are some people here forgetting the fact that the Mustangs typically run a 5L engine where as the GTI is only a 2.0L!!! Having said that which car has the better grip around corners and won't burn a hole in your pocket on fuel!!! Yeah, fuel may be cheap but not in most corners of the world!!!

I just returned after 6 months in overseas in a country where fuel is cheap and believe me I love Mustangs but when you see a GTI lined up in traffic in your side view mirrors amongst others, IT STANDS OUT!!! Especially with the Bi Xenons. (And yes they have Mustangs, Chargers, Porsches, etc... there)

When I sat in my R-Line after 6 months it was like HEAVEN! The quality, the power, the grip and the features... Camry??? Come on, are you serious??? Look at the appearance for starters! Then let's talk about performance and handling!

I think I speak for all true Golf die hard owners... :happyanim: I rest my case!
 

C4L

Banned
Oh...I 100% understand. I'm not retarded, but I just dont think our main goal on this forum is to be 100% right or 100% wrong all the time and then keep count of how many times a user was right or wrong. That's not how we roll here.

I was running out of ways to help make the truth more clear...

For that I apologize. It is NEVER my intent to start arguments. I hope you can at least see that I RARELY (never but I will give myself a pass) instigate an argument.

He posted NON-TOPICAL content merely in an effort to get a rise out of me and I called him on SOME inaccuracies in the that content. He then cried foul and got butt hurt because I did exactly what he expected me to...:confused:
 
Top