TAZZ1
Ready to race!
Well I have tried both Carbonio and Twintake.
As far as Carbonio vs. Stock goes, this is the difference I had measured in near identical conditions (back when I was stg1)
Stock Intake:
002: 6640rpm – MAF varied between 238.--g/s ~ 240.--g/s
032: Long fuel trim +1.4%, Short fuel trim -3.0%
APR Carbonio:
002: 6640 rpm – MAF varied between 244.--g/s ~ 247.--g/s
032: Long fuel trim +1.4%, Short fuel trim +0.8%
Twintake on the other hand is a true CAI and will give you a decent power gain up top (I haven't done measurements cause the readings are not accurate when you remove the stock MAF housing) much more substantial than Carbonio in terms of power.
As far as Carbonio vs. Stock goes, this is the difference I had measured in near identical conditions (back when I was stg1)
Stock Intake:
002: 6640rpm – MAF varied between 238.--g/s ~ 240.--g/s
032: Long fuel trim +1.4%, Short fuel trim -3.0%
APR Carbonio:
002: 6640 rpm – MAF varied between 244.--g/s ~ 247.--g/s
032: Long fuel trim +1.4%, Short fuel trim +0.8%
Twintake on the other hand is a true CAI and will give you a decent power gain up top (I haven't done measurements cause the readings are not accurate when you remove the stock MAF housing) much more substantial than Carbonio in terms of power.