XGC75
Go Kart Champion
They have stated that they marry the dongle for security purposes. Whether or not you believe that is beside the point. Read on. To play devils advocate, suppose the OP stole that dongle or doesn't have a bill of sale, how could APR confirm that his possession of the dongle is warranted? For APR to grant his wish to unmarry the dongle would open the potential for others to then steal many dongles and sell them. All I'm saying is that, as a policy matter, I can understand why they'd only want the original owner to request the dongle be unmarried.
Perhaps if the original owner and *****2.0t both somehow proved that the OP should be in posession of the dongle and gave their consent to have it unmarried again, APR would be complicit?
Perhaps if the original owner and *****2.0t both somehow proved that the OP should be in posession of the dongle and gave their consent to have it unmarried again, APR would be complicit?