You referring to the disk or the SACHS unit?
To clarify, this is the exact clutch kit I ordered:
SRE Performance Clutch Kit + One Mass Flywheel
[883089.000046]
Complete kit with lightened one mass flywheel (7.2kg) Transmittable Torque 530+Nm
One important thing to notice is the + sign after the torque rating figure. The general agreement is that these SRE clutches are rated to 1.5 times the conservative rating. Therefore, the clutch should hold pretty much hold whatever you throw at it unless you dump the clutch regularly...
Sorry - was referring to the SACHS unit. Seems like the SB disk good for K04 power levels but nothing beyond that because the pressure plate becomes the limiting factor at that point, correct?
Kthor703 answered your concern.
While everyone was talking about about uprated clutches, I did a lot of listening. The popular choices seem to be Southbend, Clutchmasters and some people have Bully Clutches.
The painted style pressure plate most manufacturers use is not necessarily confidence inspiring, and may members seem to have gone through some horrible experiences with clutch jobs, so much so that many are deterred from chipping their cars because of these happenings.
I then directed my attention to Sachs the Oem manufacturer of our "weak" clutches, and discovered their SRE division. Others have pointed to them before, but none that I know of were looking to bite and be the first to have it on their car.
They use a sachs pressure plate. That isn't what fails.
It's the center hub on the disk that fails.
My SB review thread was very specific about the shortcomings of the non-silent design.
The cheap clutchnet hubs that SB, CM & etc use on their disks are all just ticking time bombs for failure.
Dave
Here is a nice comparision pic for the ARCHIVES
Remember when you geek ass vortex friend says that his car have been fine for years and years with his cool painted crap plate.
Yes .... when you have a 200tq K03 , Gt28 whatever equiped 1.6-1.8 litre engine they will be fine.
The OEM will even be fine
OEM sachs mod plate that ALL f!"¤% aftermarket companies use.
Its a DEADLY tool that have almost killed 5 vortexers.
Our team have killed 3 plates for 3 different cars , 3 different drivers , 3 different styles of cars in one week.
one drag , one street and one daily driven car.
All far under the 495tq that they claim to hold.
And at the same time i want to warn you about alu flywheels.
The bolts acctually RIP RIGHT OUT when the rivets go.
A steel FW and the clutch would just have slipped
The damage is horrifying.
Compare this.
Plate 1: aftermarket 495tq plate.
Thin casing , thin cast oem disc surface , crap OEM or china,brazilian,russian rivets
ITS UNBALANCED
They bend , heat and add some sort of ring under the OEM 240mm plate.
rivet gone
Plate 2
SACHS race 450tq plate
MUCH thicker
Much better springs
Supperior disc surface
Its factory balanced
Team members car.
its a 10 000$ DRP box
This one is rated 496ft/lb and car had maximum of 440ft/lb
Just like what happend to Frankies stuff also.
The modified OEM covers are a bit unpredictable.
Modified by foffa2002@home at 3:07 AM 9-18-2009
Complete kit with lightened one mass flywheel (7.2kg) Transmittable Torque 530+Nm
One important thing to notice is the + sign after the torque rating figure. The general agreement is that these SRE clutches are rated to 1.5 times the conservative rating. Therefore, the clutch should hold pretty much hold whatever you throw at it unless you dump the clutch regularly...
SRE products are always quoted as having conservative figures. Wouldn't you rather a manufacturer under quote than over quote. I know that normal Sachs clutch kits (OEM + Aftermarket) have a safety factor of 1.5 x the engine output as standard.
How do i know this?? i work for them as a technical support technician, carrying out day to day warranty testing, reports and also technical training on clutch, DMF, suspension etc etc.
I'd be interested to know more about the OP's findings etc if/when the clutch gets dropped out.
Regards
Daniel