No flavor imparted/light brew. Easiest way to mask a light brew is to over roast the coffee... and we are back to where I started.
Not sure I follow... Starbucks brews all different types of roasts. Not to mention that Starbucks is far from the only company that sells bold roasts.
I trust there brewing methods because they put an insane amount of rigor into the science behind the the way they brew coffee.
there's a shocker :lol:
JK JK JK JK :wub:
No flavor imparted/light brew. Easiest way to mask a light brew is to over roast the coffee... and we are back to where I started.
On a mellow bean, the Starbucks brewing method is fine. You don't need a ton of time to get decent flavor out of it (its why they started with the blonde, recently). The bolder the bean, the more critical brewing times becomes to get full flavor.Not sure I follow... Starbucks brews all different types of roasts. Not to mention that Starbucks is far from the only company that sells bold roasts.
I trust there brewing methods because they put an insane amount of rigor into the science behind the the way they brew coffee.
why do i have this suspicion that if i took a starbucks sumatra or something and put it in a cup from 'mother earth's fair trade 100% legit coffee', that you would think it was better or of higher quality? why so much starbucks beef? don't hate the playa hate the gaaaaaame
I get that some people don't like bold coffee, and I also get that some people even think that Starbucks "lighter" stuff is still too bold. That's all fine and dandy but I have no clue where the notion that they choose to roast their beans a certain way to mask a "light brew" came from.
Don't know how to explain it any better than I did.
Remember boldness and the roast are two totally different things but the roast can be used to mask boldness.
No, I get what you said. Where did that information come from?
I have NEVER had an iced coffee because I don't like cream or sugar but this sounds tempting.