xHeartcoreboyx
IceCream GTI
I tried it couple times and it sucks, just too much spin, even in stock form lol
I would only use it to show off
I would only use it to show off
well, most races are from a roll which portrays(sorry couldnt find another word) a car's performance better than dig races. 0-60 times don't mean much imo
Not true. Most races (not street racing, real racing) are from a dig. Because a race is as much about Driver ability as Car ability; and controlling your car's launch is part of the process.
1/4 mile times are never reported as "from a roll"... :thumbsup:
by most races i meant most common races.i mean what vids posted here or on the mkv forums are dig races on a track? otherwise, you are right.
Gotcha. :thumbsup: I've seen many on MKV that are track runs, I won't say what I think about anyone who street races...
Agree totally; except for the 8-10k loss/upcharge part. Everyone keeps saying the R will be 10k more than a GTI but it isn't true based on what they've already said. Take a GTI and fully load it; then compare to an R and it will be ~5K more. The R will be essentially a loaded GTI with a K04 and AWD, so 5K for those two "mods" is a nice deal :thumbsup:
Can you buy a GTI for 10K less than an R? Absolutely, but you'll be giving up a helluva lot more than just the K04 and AWD.
we definitely dont make 200 to the wheels stock are you high?
lmao yea okay man your car makes 200 to the wheels :lol:
I don't know much about dynos, but I always thought this was the case based on what I've come across.
I'd be interested in learning more, could you provide more useful information, as opposed to ineffectively pointing out that everyone is wrong?
Both of the posted 200HP "results" are on Hub dynos; no rolling stock and no wheel loss. that is not HP to the wheels; not to mention there is no telling what correction factors are being used.
Stock US GTIs make 180-185 true whp on properly set dynos; as has been shown by many cars on this very forum... Euro GTIs likely make 190-195ish, on a real dyno :thumbsup:
I've been snooping around the forum for quite some time, and have had a mkv GTI. I'm very excited about the Golf R, and it's top on my list when it gets here (also interested in new Mercedes 250). I've been eyeing the Golf R since they made the announcement it's coming to the states.
Do you guys think the R will really be that much quicker then the GTI? If you take a 10% drive train loss on a FWD GTI, you are looking at around 180 whp. With a 25% drive train loss on an AWD Golf R (255 hp), you are looking at 191 whp. Plus the Golf R is going to weigh more. Now I know that the R will be more refined on the interior, the exterior looks great, and AWD is amazing to have. So the question is, are we really paying for all of these extras, and the motor and speed, 0-60, quarter mile, etc just going to be the same as the GTI???