I'll PM you since my personal health concerns cross into the domain of auto immune.
With respect (and thank you for your service) your entire response boils down to a series of appeal to experience/authority fallacies that do nothing for the data. I don't see 7 clots out of 14 million, I see incomplete data. This was the reason for the vaccine being halted, not the complete set of information. Your previous experience with clots, and the information from the CDC you posted in regard to clots doesn't make me feel any better, because that information is not in the context of this vaccine or this virus. Your sources are out of context, and your arrogance in the face of incomplete data is a cause for concern. Look at what has been submitted to VAERS just this year.
That's sad if you think that.
The link I posted shows that clots are pretty common in general, so 7 clots in a group at higher risk isn't really significant.
VAPERS are useful for spotting trends, not an actual data point of adverse reactions, because causal relationships haven't been established.
Example.
Let's, say 1 out of every 100,000 people have a heart attack today. I get a vaccine and tomorrow I have a heart attack. That could be reported as a possible event, even if I would have had a heart attack tomorrow with or without a vaccine.
If they spot a trend, then they'll look at probabilities in the general population to see if the incidence is higher or lower. During that time, they'll often halt use of a drug until they can figure that out.
That isn't an appeal to authority. That's how all this works. Again, you can be terrified if you want. You're choice, but the facts don't support your terror.
