On city driving around here the limit on most roads are 45 and traffic moves around 55-60. So I guess everyone is speeding.
This is a good point that I neglected. Driving at the speed limit actually feels more dangerous to me than driving at the speed of traffic - you have to drive almost entirely from your rear view mirror like you're running NASCAR at Talledaga, constantly getting passed by EVERYONE including most trucks. On the occasion that you do need to pass a truck you either piss everyone off forcing them to slow down behind you or have to speed yourself just to get around them. It's incredibly stressful compared to just speeding like most everyone else.
Certain parts of the Philly highway system are at 45 MPH limits. Its annoying, but then again everyone is going 65, and the cops hardly ever pull anyone over for speeding on a highway inside the city limit. Unless they are driving like a complete douche.
Inside the Philly limits, it's either drive like an asshole or get run over.
Most cities seem to be like that. Detroit, Chicago, Boston, and New York at least are all the same. If traffic is moving, you have to pretend you're being chased by the cops to get anywhere :lol:
Most cities seem to be like that. Detroit, Chicago, Boston, and New York at least are all the same. If traffic is moving, you have to pretend you're being chased by the cops to get anywhere :lol:
Its one thing I miss about living in Atlanta. 7 lanes of traffic all flowing safely at 80 mph without issue.
Seattle has lethargic Prius drivers camping in the left lane who are freaked out by either sun or rain.
Conclusion: Speeding saves me just over 1.5 full work weeks of time per year at a measily cost of $9.60 per hour.
How exactly is speeding not worth it again?
Yep. Gotta slice and dice.
Boston has some of the craziest and worst drivers, from my experience.
Your analysis doesn't include the increased risk of tickets or accidents. I know you think you have those under control but that doesn't change the fact that the risk IS increased. This is hard to quantify but it adds tail risk, i.e. catastrophic risks of totaling the car, injury from accident, associated medical/legal cost etc. and therefore that 9.60 would be a bit higher. Tail risks are low probability but high cost. Just takes split second of a wandering mind out of an entire years worth of driving for a catastrophic event.
I'd argue like I did earlier that speeding (at the speed of traffic) actually carries less risk than driving the speed limit (significantly slower than the speed of traffic). Zero tickets and accidents in over a decade so far seem to support the argument as well.
really? the times I've been in ATL the traffic was quite bad.